An Instapundit reader illustrates both the perils of blindly raising income tax rates and the financial pointlessness of many married women working:
After the election, my wife and I are going partial Galt. We’re in
California, so our state income tax went up in addition to what’s sure
to come out of Washington.
My wife quit her job last week. I increased my participation in a
tax deferment plan offered by my employer to bring my taxable income as
close to $250K as possible. We’ll be cutting back a little, but the
government is going to getting a whole lot less.
My wife’s entire salary barely covered our tax bill – she was 100%
slave to the government, while I was a 10% slave. Now she is 100% free,
and I’ll be a ~35% slave As a couple, 17.5% of our time is slaving on
the government plantation from an astounding 55% previously.
My wife is deliriously happy, our children are delighted to have mom
home, the dog gets more walks, and I find not spending money rapturously
Statist theoreticians and bureaucrats never seem to understand that humans always modify their behavior in response to prospective stimuli. And when they finally do, after failing to achieve the results expected, they usually make the mistake of attempting to forcibly limit human options, thereby falling into exactly the same trap. And the smarter and more productive the individual, the more his contributions are required, the more likely it is that he will figure out a way to refuse to participate.
Here is a trivially easy prediction. California will collect less tax revenue than estimated in 2013 despite its newly raised rates that theoretically will cause it to collect more. Moreover, it will probably collect less than it did in 2012, and its budget deficit will rise.