As I mentioned earlier today, I banned Palooka for ignoring my warning, refusing to argue specifics, and finally, declaring that I was arguing dishonestly. A few minutes ago, an anonymous poster posted the following:
I don’t understand. You banned him becuase you didn’t want to deal with his arguments?
It seems to me you have conceded a crucial point of his–that the possibility of sabotage and espionage were relevant. If they were relevant, as you now claim, then why do you claim the case for internment is totally baseless and absurd? It seems to me you banned this Palooka character because he blew your argument to bits.
Palooka IP: 4.240.60.xx
Anonymous IP: 4.240.60.xxx
That’s just sad.