Freaking midwits

If you don’t understand the difference between VHQ/UHQ and mere Mensa intelligence, perhaps this might help. Pewdiepie and millions of others have been amused by a video in which the arrogant and credentialed erroneously rate themselves as possessing higher intelligence than a military man who never went to college.

But no one should have been even remotely surprised, nor should any of the people in the video rated the man lower than everyone else, because the guy literally told them what his tested approximate IQ percentile was during the discussion period.

He actually tested a little higher on whatever IQ test they took – 97th instead of 94th, which indicates the military test takers are slightly above the norm – but no one should have rated him below third. I would have rated him second, below Asian Harvard guy. And note that even what is generally considered the educational elite peaks at a standard deviation below genuine high IQ levels.

Trust the science, ladies

 Somehow, I doubt the Vaccine Nazis will mindlessly obey this dictate on alcohol from the World Health Organization:

THE World Health Organisation (WHO) has been accused of being “sexist and paternalistic” by suggesting women of childbearing age should not drink alcohol.

Its latest Global Alcohol Action Plan lays out how countries should pay “appropriate attention” to the prevention of drinking among children, expectant mothers and women of childbearing age. The UK’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) says females between the ages of 15 and 45 fall into this category.

Experts suggested that the harmful effects of alcohol on women could be publicised through a global “world no alcohol day/week”.

It added: “Appropriate attention should be given to the prevention of the initiation of drinking among children and adolescents, prevention of drinking among pregnant women and women of childbearing age, and protection of people from pressures to drink.”

That might be effective anti-vaccine rhetoric. “You know the same scientists telling you to get the Covid vaccine are also telling you that you can’t drink until you’re 45, right?”

Portugal’s fake pandemic

COVID-19 was never the threat it was portrayed to be, as official Portuguese government documents have conclusively proved:

As per a ruling by the Lisbon court, only 0.9{cc08d85cfa54367952ab9c6bd910a003a6c2c0c101231e44cdffb103f39b73a6} of ‘verified cases’ died of COVID, numbering 152, and not 17,000 as claimed by the government. The ruling has proved that the government faked COVID-19 death statistics.

Following a citizen’s petition, a Lisbon court was forced to provide verified COVID-19 mortality data.

According to the ruling, the number of verified COVID-19 deaths from January 2020 to April 2021 is only 152, not about 17,000 as claimed by government ministries.

All the “others” died for various reasons, although their PCR test was positive.

Dying with a cold, or diabetes, or high blood pressure, is not the same thing as dying of it. This means that the actual US Covid death toll is probably closer to 5,365 than the 600,000 publicly claimed. In the meantime, it’s getting harder to hide the significant adverse affects of the sterilization shots, as daily flight cancellations rose to 2704, nearly one thousand more than the 1753 first reported one week ago.

The statistical chicanery is also getting more and more obvious to even the most gullible observer as various 2020 numbers are reported. Somehow, despite the flu having been almost eliminated due to masks and lockdown, the CDC reported more than 50,000 flu deaths in 2020, which is normal for the USA.

A very bad bargain

Karl Denninger does the math and demonstrates that you are 20 times more likely to have your heart permanently damaged by the not-vaxxes than die of Covid:

Here you go folks, from a mainstream media outlet.

The US Food and Drug Administration added a warning about the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis to fact sheets for Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccines Friday. The warning notes that reports of adverse events following vaccination — particularly after the second dose — suggest increased risks of both types of heart inflammation. Earlier this week, vaccine advisers to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention heard that the agency had received about 1,200 reports of such heart inflammation after 300 million doses of the two vaccines had been given. CDC has confirmed about 300 of those cases, many of them among young men and adolescents.

I will point out that the odds of a healthy under-18 person being killed by Covid-19 are approximately 1 in 250,000 in the US.  Only a small percentage of the total 150 million or so “vaccinated” (note that most are 2-dose, so the 300 million number is an attempt to cut the actual risk in half) are in kids thus far, perhaps 15 million or so.  It is thus roughly 20 times as likely as you will get hit by this if you’re a young person as you will die of Covid.

Further, a material percentage of these cases have reduced ejection fraction detected and materially elevated troponin values, both of which imply serious cardiac compromise.  That damage is likely permanent and the mortality rate from this condition is not encouraging.

Clearly, for an underlying disease that is almost-never fatal in healthy people under 30 that’s a bad bargain….  The FDA has now admitted that I, and a few others who blew the whistle on this months ago in terms of both the dangers from the shots and what was going to happen with the virus originally were right and yet exactly zero of those who were conned have nutted up and taken out the trash, so spare me the crying when it goes bad on you and those you love.  That which you cheered on deserves zero sympathy from anyone.

Throw in the Israeli data indicating that there are 2 vaccine deaths for every 3 Covid deaths, and that bad bargain becomes a very bad one that crosses the line into reprehensibly stupid territory.

Do. Not. Get. Vaxxed. There is absolutely no reason or excuse or rationalization that can scientifically or statistically justify doing so under any circumstances. Not even if your obese, immuno-suppressed grandmother with asthma is celebrating her 95th birthday, your wife is threatening to divorce you, and your boss is threatening to fire you. 

Do not do it.

Lifetime protection

The good news is science has suddenly changed its mind and decided that the experimental genetic modification will actually provide lifetime protection against Covid:

Both the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines may provide lifetime protection against COVID-19, a new study suggests. Researchers found that people who received either of the two-dose shots, which use new messenger RNA (mRNA) technology, had strong and ‘persistent’ immune responses.

What’s more, the vaccines produced high levels of neutralizing antibodies against two variants of the virus.

This could mean that Pfizer and Moderna recipients could have long-lasting immunity – for years or potentially the rest of their lives – and may not even need boosters, reported first by The New York Times.

The bad news, of course, is that this assumes a life expectancy of 4-6 months, followed by death by heart attack and/or blood clots. 

Translation: these shots are killing and damaging so many people that Big Pharma needed to produce an excuse not to provide the booster shots.

Never trust the science

It’s hard to “trust the science” when the science goes into hiding as soon as it becomes obvious they were completely and utterly wrong. And by “science”, of course, I mean “scientistry”.

The editor of respected medical journal The Lancet has refused to reveal if he still supports a controversial letter debunking claims that COVID-19 started in a Chinese laboratory.
The letter was published in The Lancet last February and was signed by 27 eminent public health experts who described speculation about the origins of the virus from a Wuhan laboratory as ‘rumours’ and ‘misinformation.’
When MailOnline contacted The Lancet’s editor, Dr Richard Horton about the decision to publish and support the letter, both he and his office declined to comment.

It’s informative to see how scientists are perfectly happy to issue authoritative pronouncements right up until the moment that the facts actually begin to arrive. Then they clam up and go into hiding.

Never, ever, “trust the science”. Because scientists are corrupt. Science is just another word for engineering that doesn’t work. 

Seeing intelligence

I have always said that one can literally see that a person is more intelligent than the norm by looking at their eyes. I wonder if that observation was based on subconsciously picking up on large pupil size:

A person’s intelligence and brain function correlates to the size of their pupils, a new eye-popping study by US researchers suggests. The study claims that the larger the pupil, the smarter its owner. Cognitive abilities like attention control, fluid intelligence and working memory capacity have been linked to baseline pupil size by researchers at Georgia Institute of Technology, who conducted several large-scale studies involving over 500 participants.
First, they calculated the average pupil size of each of the participants — aged between 18 and 35 years old — using a special tracking device with a camera linked to a computer. Normally, a constricted pupil — the black circular aperture in the center of the eye — is two to four millimeters in size, and fully dilates to up to eight millimeters. 
The participants were then offered a series of cognitive tests measuring their abilities to stay focused and control attention while being intentionally distracted, to reason through new problems and remember new information. The laboratory was kept dim in order for the pupils not to constrict in response to light. 
“We found that a larger baseline pupil size was correlated with greater fluid intelligence, attention control and, to a lesser degree, working memory capacity,” researchers concluded, with their findings published in the June issue of the Cognition international journal.

I tend to perceive intelligence in the eyes as an active awareness, or in some cases a liveliness, that doesn’t necessarily translate to the person’s expression, tone, or behavior. Not every intelligent person shows this, but I’ve never met anyone who did who didn’t later prove to be intelligent. It might also explain why people instinctively avoid eye contact when they don’t want to indicate that they are anyone out of the ordinary.

More evidence of the obvious

The white line of silence has apparently been broken:

Two U.S. experts have penned a damning essay saying that science strongly suggests the novel coronavirus was manufactured inside a Chinese laboratory.  The claim was made by Drs Stephen Quay, CEO of biopharmaceutical company Atossa Therapeutics Inc, and Richard Muller, a physics professor at the University of California Berkeley, in The Wall Street Journal on Sunday.

In the op-ed, the men say their proof lies in genome sequencing, or analyzing the DNA, of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.

There are 36 DNA segments – made up of three-letter ‘words’ – that viruses use to make an amino acid known as L-arginine.

L-arginine helps make proteins but is also often used in so-called ‘gain of function’ research, which alters viruses to make them more transmissible and more deadly.

The new virus contains a segment called CGG-CGG, which is considered rare even in experiments in which researchers are trying to manipulate virus.

But even more telling is that this combination has never been found naturally in any other type of coronavirus, including in SARS and MERS, both of which are cousins of the new virus.

There will be more to come. A lot more to come.

The COVID coverup

It’s now becoming clear that COVID-19 is a man-made bioweapon that was constructed in China and funded by what appear to be rogue globalist elements inside the US government connected with the NGO billionaires like Gates and Soros:

The new report examining the behind-the-scenes battle over COVID’s origins follows new evidence to support the theory that the coronavirus pandemic may have leaked from WIV — raising questions about why the possibility wasn’t investigated more thoroughly from the outset. 
‘The story of why parts of the U.S. government were not as curious as many of us think they should have been is a hugely important one,’ David Feith, former deputy assistant secretary of state in the East Asia bureau, told Vanity Fair.
In an interview with the outlet, DiNanno describes how his probe into the lab leak theory was thwarted at every turn, with hostile and antagonistic technical staff warning him not to open ‘Pandora’s box.’
Things came to a head at a meeting on December 9, when State Department staff met to discuss what the department could or should say publicly about the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
According to people at the meeting, Christopher Park, the director of the State Department’s Biological Policy Staff in the Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation, not to say anything that would point to the U.S. government’s own role in gain-of-function research. Park, a Trump appointee like DiNanno, had been involved in lifting a U.S. government moratorium on funding for gain-of-function research in 2017. Park was reportedly not the only one who raised concerns about the investigation ultimately raising questions about U.S. funding. 
As the group probed the lab-leak scenario and other possibilities, its members were repeatedly advised not to open a ‘Pandora’s box,’ four former State Department officials told the magazine.
The admonitions ‘smelled like a cover-up,’ said DiNanno, ‘and I wasn’t going to be part of it.’
It’s unclear exactly much U.S. government funding was going to the WIV, but at least some of it was being routed through a nonprofit called EcoHealth Alliance.
By 2018, EcoHealth Alliance was pulling in up to $15 million a year in grant money from an array of federal agencies, including the Defense Department, Homeland Security, and the U.S. Agency for International Development, according to tax filings.
EcoHealth Alliance and its founder Peter Daszak have been working with Shi Zhengli, the WIV virologist known as the ‘bat lady’, for more than 15 years. 
British-born Daszak, 55, is the president of EcoHealth Alliance — and in the early days of the pandemic, he was key in establishing the veneer of a ‘scientific consensus’ that the lab-leak origin was impossible.
Daszak not only signed but spearheaded a letter signed by 27 scientists rejecting the lab leak hypothesis, which was published on February 19, 2020 in the medical journal The Lancet.
Leaked emails later revealed that he encouraged colleagues who do gain-of-function research on coronaviruses not to sign the letter, in order to obscure the connection.
The letter declared that the scientists had ‘no competing interests’ — but it seems clear that Daszak did, as a lab leak origin would likely derail his entire field, but an animal origin would justify his life’s work.  

The next question that needs to be determined is if the plans for the creation of the not-vaccines were completed prior to the release of COVID-19. Regardless, this is already one of the worst US government crimes in history. While China is obviously involved, one should keep in mind that it is possible that the Chinese government was not the primary party responsible, given the amount of US government money that was secretly funneled to Wuhan through the US nonprofit.

It is a product of the bioweapons program of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) government, the network of which includes not only the CCP scientists but also certain overseas scientists and organizations.

– Dr. Li-Meng Ya

And apparently, this wouldn’t be the first time a leak from a Chinese bioweapons lab killed people around the world:

In 1977 a flu broke out in northeast China which eventually spread to Russia and then around the world. It eventually took the lives of approximately 700,000 people around the world most of whom were young. It came to be known as the “Russian flu” because Russia was the first country to report it to the WHO. Scientists who examined its DNA concluded it was nearly identical to a previous strain of the flu virus which had caused an outbreak between 1949 and 1950.

In nature, the flu doesn’t remain unchanged for 27 years as it circulates. So the fact that the “Russian flu” was nearly identical to the earlier strain eventually led to the conclusion that the Russian flu was likely the result of a lab leak….

You may wish to note that more than a year ago, in April 2020, I concluded that everyone was lying and the evidence “tends to indicate the coronavirus as a coordinated Deep State attack on China, Iran, the Trump administration, and the American people.”

The poisonous spike protein

 As uninterested scientists take a closer look at the not-vaccines, the news keeps getting worse.

We now know the spike protein gets into circulation. We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, we never knew it was a toxin. So by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.

– Dr. Byram Bridle, University of Guelph

I think that “inadvertently” is probably a little too generous. You know the viral immunologist is a concern to Big Pharma, as someone has already set up a false flag website using his name as the URL for the purpose of deboonking his statements.

Meanwhile, an Oracle VP learns the hard way that the Devil mocks his servants.

  • I got my first vaccination today. I am incredibly proud of @Oracle and the team that worked tirelessly to create and run v-safe for the USA.
    • Joel R. Kallman@joelkallman, Mar 26
  • We’re heartbroken to share that Joel Kallman has passed away from Covid-19 on May 25th. He was 54. Joel’s warmth and enthusiasm touched countless across the globe. We miss him dearly.
    • Oracle APEX@OracleAPEX, May 27
Karl Denninger’s conclusion:

It is, on the weight of the scientific evidence at this time, profoundly unsafe to produce, distribute or administer any vaccine that causes production of the spike protein in the human body where it can and does enter the circulation, whether directly or indirectly, because the protein itself and its S1 sub-unit are believed pathogenic standing alone.  This has now been known for months, indeed the first papers demonstrating this were out before any material number of jabs went into arms and have been deliberately ignored.